HE IS RETIRING 65 YEAR OLD AND IS GOING TO GET SOMEONE YOUNGER,HE WAS PAYING FULL TIME WAITERS MORE THAN PART TIME WORKERS,HE HADNT ADAPTED EQUIPMENT FOR DISABLED PEOPLE,HE DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE PREGNANT DAN AND RYAN
1. age 2. part time workers getting paid less 3. not employing disabled people because of no wheelchair access 4. pregnant women forced to leave job jack and laurence
the things that stan has done which are illegal is not adapting the pub to disables peoples needs due to the expence, also stan has paid a full time worker than two part time workers for the same job just so he can keep the worker, also he doesn't let pregnant people work at his restaurant and they would have to leave, furthermore, he's going to make a 65 year old to retire on his birthday and get a younger employee to work. also stan lowered the employees wages for no apparent reason, these four things should not happen in a working environment.
1. he can't sack the pregnant woman without talking to her about paternity leave 2. they can't pay the waitresses below the minimum wage 3. you can't not take on staff because they're disabled 4. you can't sack the gardener because he's old..
the waitresses were bieng paid minimum wage but the male waiter was on more thean a pound an hour. also stan doesnt let disabled people come in. he also said that pregnant women could not work in the pub so they would have to leave. age
1 - stan is paying part time workers less then he is paying the full time workers in hourly wages. 2 - Stan was asking the old man to retire on his 65th birthday just because he is old, he amted to replace him with someone younger. 3 - He specifically paid one full time worker more then another just because he was good at his job and didnt want to lose him. 4 - He mentioned that it would be too expensive for him to insert a ramp for the disabled people and he said that there was no disabled workers in the pub anyway. Connor & Hadi
1) Stan was asking the old man to retire on his 65th birthday just because he is old, he wanted to replace him with someone younger. 2)Stan is paying the part time workers less than the full time workers in an hourly wage. 3)He specificly payed one full time worker more because he was better at the job and didn't want to lose him. 4)He mentioned that it would be too expensive for him to insert a ramp for the disabled people and he said that there was no disabled workers in the pub anyway. Connor & Hadi
1.Who had been off ill all week with a bad cold was almost 65 years old. Stan explained thathis birthday would be a good time for him to retire and get someone new and younger to join the business.
2.The two part-time waitresses are on minimum wage and the waiter who is full time was on more than one pound more than the waitresses.
3.Did not bother to get equipment to help disabled people because no disabled people worked there.
4.Karen thought better about pregnant women as they shouldn’t really come back after having their child.
stan has no adaptations to cater to potenial disabled staff. he said he wants to pay below minimum wage to the part time staff he said he gunna get rid of the old gardener because hes old and get a young one pregnant women should not be sacked without spoke to about paternity leave from conor and andy <3<3
1: wanted the gardener to retire because he thinks he was too old for the job and wanted someone younger to do it. 2: he doesnt want anyone disabled because he dosent want to put in a ramp 3: wouldnt let any pregnant women in because he thinks it would be dangerous 4: two part-time waitresses was being paid the minimum wage when a full-time waiter was being paid alot more then the part-time every hour
HE IS RETIRING 65 YEAR OLD AND IS GOING TO GET SOMEONE YOUNGER,HE WAS PAYING FULL TIME WAITERS MORE THAN PART TIME WORKERS,HE HADNT ADAPTED EQUIPMENT FOR DISABLED PEOPLE,HE DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE PREGNANT
ReplyDeleteDAN AND RYAN
i think you forgot to take caps off =P
Delete1. age
ReplyDelete2. part time workers getting paid less
3. not employing disabled people because of no wheelchair access
4. pregnant women forced to leave job
jack and laurence
He is retiring a 65 year old and he is going to get someonme younger.
ReplyDeleteHe is paying full time waiters more than part time.
Jordan
Wheelchair access
ReplyDeleteCan't fire someone because they are pregnant
Can't pay them lower than minimum wage
Giving someone younger a job
Joe and Casey
• No wheelchair access
ReplyDelete• Waiter payed more than waitresses
• No respect for female employees
• Not correct equipment
Leo & Zak
the things that stan has done which are illegal is not adapting the pub to disables peoples needs due to the expence, also stan has paid a full time worker than two part time workers for the same job just so he can keep the worker, also he doesn't let pregnant people work at his restaurant and they would have to leave, furthermore, he's going to make a 65 year old to retire on his birthday and get a younger employee to work. also stan lowered the employees wages for no apparent reason, these four things should not happen in a working environment.
ReplyDeletejosh.... ishti
#disabled#
Deletehi guys xoxoxox
ReplyDelete1. he can't sack the pregnant woman without talking to her about paternity leave
2. they can't pay the waitresses below the minimum wage
3. you can't not take on staff because they're disabled
4. you can't sack the gardener because he's old..
from andy and conor
<3
xxxx
the waitresses were bieng paid minimum wage but the male waiter was on more thean a pound an hour.
ReplyDeletealso stan doesnt let disabled people come in.
he also said that pregnant women could not work in the pub so they would have to leave.
age
tom + theresa
1 - stan is paying part time workers less then he is paying the full time workers in hourly wages.
ReplyDelete2 - Stan was asking the old man to retire on his 65th birthday just because he is old, he amted to replace him with someone younger.
3 - He specifically paid one full time worker more then another just because he was good at his job and didnt want to lose him.
4 - He mentioned that it would be too expensive for him to insert a ramp for the disabled people and he said that there was no disabled workers in the pub anyway. Connor & Hadi
1) Stan was asking the old man to retire on his 65th birthday just because he is old, he wanted to replace him with someone younger.
ReplyDelete2)Stan is paying the part time workers less than the full time workers in an hourly wage.
3)He specificly payed one full time worker more because he was better at the job and didn't want to lose him.
4)He mentioned that it would be too expensive for him to insert a ramp for the disabled people and he said that there was no disabled workers in the pub anyway.
Connor & Hadi
1.Who had been off ill all week with a bad cold was almost 65 years old. Stan explained thathis birthday would be a good time for him to retire and get someone new and younger to join the business.
ReplyDelete2.The two part-time waitresses are on minimum wage and the waiter who is full time was on more than one pound more than the waitresses.
3.Did not bother to get equipment to help disabled people because no disabled people worked there.
4.Karen thought better about pregnant women as they shouldn’t really come back after having their child.
Will and Alex
stan has no adaptations to cater to potenial disabled staff.
ReplyDeletehe said he wants to pay below minimum wage to the part time staff
he said he gunna get rid of the old gardener because hes old and get a young one
pregnant women should not be sacked without spoke to about paternity leave
from conor and andy <3<3
1: wanted the gardener to retire because he thinks he was too old for the job and wanted someone younger to do it.
ReplyDelete2: he doesnt want anyone disabled because he dosent want to put in a ramp
3: wouldnt let any pregnant women in because he thinks it would be dangerous
4: two part-time waitresses was being paid the minimum wage when a full-time waiter was being paid alot more then the part-time every hour
Luca Colella :p